Consequences of the Mutual Funds Transgressions

November 1, 2003

Dire Consequences of the Mutual Fund Industry’s History of 
Transgressions 
 
In a speech at the Gartner Techinvestors Summit on November 
12, 2003 in New York, Edward Siedle, President of 
Benchmark, made the following comments regarding wrongdoing 
at mutual fund companies and the potential impact of such 
malfeasance upon certain fund complexes. (These comments 
were analyzed in a November 17th article by Geoffrey Colvin 
of Fortune Magazine entitled "Mutual Funds: The Scandal May 
Get Much Worse.") 
 
1. Unethical and illegal activity is rampant throughout the 
mutual fund industry. It’s not just a few bad apples at a 
few companies. It’s everywhere. As a result of years of 
toothless enforcement of the applicable laws by the SEC, 
the industry has lost sight of the harm to investors 
resulting from such activity. 
 
2. This activity has been longstanding-­ existing for over 
20 years. As mutual fund companies experienced spectacular 
growth beginning in the 1980s, fund executives began to 
believe they could do no wrong. Investors poured money into 
funds and products with dubious investment merits were 
pumped out in response to that demand. The American masses 
for the first time in history hired professional money 
managers. Funds promised the benefits of diversification, 
professional management and comprehensive regulation. 
Investors were never fully informed as to the outrageous 
conflicts of interest prevalent throughout the industry and 
the quantifiable harm related to these conflicts. 
 
3. Illegal and improper mutual fund activity costs 
investors billions annually. Our investigations reveal that 
at a minimum 50% of all mutual fund investment advisory 
fees and portfolio trading costs are excessive. Fund boards 
have breached their fiduciary duties by causing investors 
to pay these costs. When you add to these excessive fees, 
illegal personal trading and other schemes designed to 
benefit insiders at the expense of retail investors, the 
actual long-term price tag related to the industry’s 
misdeeds could be a trillion. 
 
4. Our investigations have uncovered that senior 
managements at mutual fund advisers has aided, abetted and 
even participated in the illegal activity that has 
occurred. Compliance within mutual fund advisory firms has 
been intentionally ignored. False documents have been 
created to conceal illegal activity. Fund boards have been 
willing to look the other way and accept even absurd 
representations by managers. Managers are never fired and 
the threat of litigation has been minimal. 
 
5. Non-disparagement and confidentiality agreements have 
enabled fund advisers to keep their misdeeds from public 
scrutiny. The attorney client privilege has been broadly 
construed to permit obstructions of justice. The SEC has 
ignored these practices and has looked the other way. 
 
6. Once fully exposed, the liabilities related to certain 
mutual fund advisers’ histories of misdeeds could cause 
these firms to either crumble or survive with greatly 
reduced operations. 
 
Mutual fund advisers have been playing with other people’s 
money for decades. To date mutual fund investors have paid 
the price for the industry’s lack of ethics. In the future 
the price will likely be borne by the industry itself.


Setting Standards For The Investment Management Industry

Home              Current Article             Benchmark In the News               About Benchmark          Contact Us  

Contents © Benchmark Financial Services, Inc.

Powered by sitebuilder365.com